Skip to content

Simulation — 7-Tier MC Benchmark

The ruler every live result is measured against.

Read this first

The doctrine

A ruler, not a motivational target.

Verbatim from the benchmark standard: live performance should be compared to percentile bands and risk-state behavior, with median as the expected centerline and percentile bands defining the normal range. Do not panic below median. Do not worship a lucky P90 month. Do not chase the target blindly.

How MARS uses this

The Dynamic 7-Tier Benchmark converts the drawdown distribution into modeled tier-usage expectations: given the gate transitions the evidence implies, T1-T3 should host most deployment while T5-T7 stay exceptional. Live tier dwell is audited against this profile every cycle.

T75%T616%T538%T471%T392%T287%T183%bar = tier authority · fill = modeled expected dwell given the gate historyhigh tiers exist to be rare — heavy T5–T7 dwell is aggression drift, not ambition

How it benefits you

Aggression drift becomes measurable before it becomes expensive. Over-dwelling in high tiers shows as a gap against the model - a pattern on a ladder rather than an oversized loss - and chronic under-deployment surfaces just as clearly as unmonetized, already-earned authority.

The seven-tier ladder with modeled dwell: how often each tier should be in use given the gate history. High tiers exist to be rare.

The two questions

02

Inside the envelope — and why?

The primary question is whether live MARS performance behaves inside the simulated benchmark envelope. The secondary question is whether any difference is favorable alpha, normal variance, execution drag, excessive drawdown, or governance failure. Every deviation gets classified — never judged by feel.

  • Above-median equity with worse-than-adverse drawdown bands is structurally unhealthy, not impressive.
  • Excess time in defensive gates versus simulated gate dwell flags capital pressure early.
  • Tier usage compared to the model reveals aggression drift before it shows in P&L.

Reference

Simulation foundation — the benchmark's core assumptions

AssumptionValueOperating meaning
Paths50,000Stable Monte Carlo run count for percentile bands
Horizon52 weeksFull-year benchmark window
Trade rhythm4 cycles × 4 trades = 16/weekCore live cadence the model assumes
Gate evaluationAfter each completed cycleNo mid-cycle gate switching
System lockDD worse than −40%Locked paths stop and never count as completions
Branch weightsNormal 45 / TP 33.75 / TNP 11.25 / OF 10Benchmark mix — know your live drift before comparing

Inside this module

2 pages go deeper than this one.

Connected inside MARS

This module doesn't work alone.

Go deeper

Operator briefs on this territory.

Every module ships in the complete MARS package.

One price. Eleven workbooks, three TradingView indicators, and the full manual library — $497.