Skip to content

Trend Continuation · Agreement / Veto Reading

Agreement, partial agreement, and veto.

The key idea

Worked example

Each closed trade logs its worst adverse excursion and best favorable excursion. The lab plots them into quadrants and pairs the picture with capture efficiency, giveback, and fee drag - then the EV Driver Diagnostics rank which repair (entry location, coefficient, trail logic, cost avoidance) would move net expectancy most.

Every trade plotted by pain taken (MAE) versus opportunity generated (MFE). The four quadrants diagnose entry precision and exit management at a glance.

CLEAN: low pain, high opportunitySURVIVORS: works, but absorbs painQUIET: low pain, low reachBLEEDERS: pain without payoffMAE (stop consumed) →MFE (opportunity) →

Reading the stack

Agreement, partial agreement, and veto.

Full agreement across Ichimoku, MACD, RSI-MFI, and ADX is the high-confidence continuation read that supports patient trailing. Partial agreement — momentum firing without structural support, or strength without participation — argues for Trend Partial's earlier banking over No-Partial patience. Systematic disagreement is a veto on trend management regardless of how the chart feels.

  • ADX weakness during a trail is the earliest exit-tightening cue the stack provides.
  • The read pairs with the volatility zone: continuation confidence in an Extreme zone still demands wider coefficients or a pass.
  • Stack state at entry and at key checkpoints gets captured, feeding later analysis of which reads actually predicted continuation.

Where it lives

02

Inside Trend Continuation.

Within Trend Continuation, this is one load-bearing idea — worth its own page. The parent module frames it this way: The Trend Continuation Indicator stacks Ichimoku structure, MACD momentum, RSI-MFI flow, and ADX strength into a single continuation read — the on-chart companion to the trend branches' fat-tail doctrine.

Veto economics

A cheap no is the most valuable output the stack produces.

The veto's value is asymmetric: it costs one skipped trade that might have worked, and it saves the full-R losses that clustered where the engines disagreed. Backtested across the evidence base, disagreement zones carry materially worse expectancy — the veto simply refuses to fund the worst-performing regime the stack can identify.

Before you go deeper

Connected inside MARS

This module doesn't work alone.

Go deeper

Operator briefs on this territory.

Every module ships in the complete MARS package.

One price. Eleven workbooks, three TradingView indicators, and the full manual library — $497.