Weekly Scorecard · What It Is Not
Boundaries keep it honest.
Read this first
What it is not
01Boundaries keep it honest.
Not the raw trade log (that's the Journal). Not the R&D sandbox (that's the EV Lab). Not a Monte Carlo simulator (that's the benchmark layer). And explicitly not a discretionary override system.
Where it lives
02Inside Weekly Scorecard.
Pulled from the Weekly Scorecard page so it can be linked, cited, and studied on its own. In the module's words: The Weekly Trading Scorecard is the weekly expectancy health monitor. It converts branch-level probabilities into branch EV, blends by the active profile weights, and tags the week by expectancy health — replacing 'did I make money?' with 'is the system still worth deploying?'
Boundary enforcement
03The scorecard grades weeks. It never authorizes trades.
A GREEN week grants no sizing authority and a RED week revokes none directly — those powers belong to the gate and throttle layers. The boundary is worth policing because scorecard-as-permission is a seductive failure mode: three green weeks feel like a license, and the architecture exists precisely so that feeling has nowhere to cash itself.
Connected inside MARS
This module doesn't work alone.
Go deeper
Operator briefs on this territory.
Deep dive — 01
Three good grades in a row feel like a licence. They grant nothing at all.
A healthy grade is information. It is not currency, and it cannot be spent on size.
Read the full brief →
Deep dive — 02
A red grade names the symptom and is structurally incapable of naming the cause.
It monitors. Four other surfaces diagnose, and the grade cannot do their job.
Read the full brief →
Deep dive — 03
A single bad grade changes your posture. Only a pattern should change your system.
Respond to the week immediately. Respond to the system only when the months agree.
Read the full brief →
Every module ships in the complete MARS package.
One price. Eleven workbooks, three TradingView indicators, and the full manual library — $497.